
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal and Child
Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden Infant Death Resource
Center. This and past issues are available online at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
May
30, 2008
1. American Academy of Pediatrics Releases Online Version
of Bright
Futures Guidelines
2. Report Tracks Country-Level Implementation of Interventions Proven
to Reduce Mortality Among Mothers, Newborns, or
Children
3. Panel Reviews National Study Plan on Environmental and Genetic
Effects on Health in Children
4. Researchers Review Evidence on the Impact of Weight Gain Among
Women During Pregnancy
5. Authors Examine Evidence on the Benefits and Harms of Screening
for
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
6. Article Investigates Neighborhoods' Influence on the Association
Between Maternal Age and Birthweight
************************************************************
1. AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS RELEASES ONLINE VERSION OF BRIGHT FUTURES
GUIDELINES
Bright Futures Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and
Adolescents --Third Edition provides information to help pediatricians provide
better health care, save time, and keep up with changes in families, communities,
and society that impact infant, child, and adolescent health. The guidelines,
recently made available for download from the American Academy of Pediatrics'
Bright Futures Web site, are organized into 10 themes common to all stages
of development, followed by specific guidance for each of 31 recommended health
supervision visits from infancy through late adolescence. Growth charts and
the newly revised periodicity schedule are included. The guidelines and reference
information are available at http://brightfutures.aap.org/3rd_Edition_Guidelines_and_Pocket_Guide.html.
Slides and handouts for use and customization in making presentations about
Bright Futures are also available for download at http://brightfutures.aap.org/bright_futures_power_point_presentations.html.
************************************************************
2.
REPORT TRACKS COUNTRY-LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERVENTIONS PROVEN TO REDUCE
MORTALITY AMONG MOTHERS, NEWBORNS, OR CHILDREN
Tracking Progress in Maternal,
Newborn, and Child Survival: The 2008 Report focuses attention on national
coverage levels for high-impact interventions in 68 countries
with the highest maternal and child mortality rates. The report, published as
a working document by the United Nations Children's Fund, summarizes the activities
of Countdown 2015, a collaboration of individuals and institutions established
in 2005 to stimulate country action by tracking implementation levels for interventions
needed to reduce child mortality and improve maternal health. The report summary
presents the Countdown's principles, priority countries, interventions and indicators,
key findings and conclusions, and challenges to progress, as well as the call
to action. In the main body of the report, the authors explain why and how the
priority countries were selected; summarize the selection of indicators, the
data sources, and the methods used to track progress; and discuss the findings.
The authors take specific note of countries with demonstrated progress in raising
implementation levels and areas where intensified effort is needed within and
across the priority countries. Profiles for each of the 68 Countdown priority
countries contain information on selected demographic measures of maternal, newborn,
and child survival and nutritional status; implementation rates for priority
interventions; and selected indicators of equity, policy support, human resources,
and financial flows. The executive summary (available in English, French, and
Spanish) and full report are
available at http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/reports.
Country profiles
are also available separately at http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=62.
************************************************************
3. PANEL REVIEWS NATIONAL STUDY PLAN ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND GENETIC EFFECTS ON
HEALTH IN CHILDREN
The National Children's Study Research Plan: A Review presents a scientific assessment
of a national longitudinal study to examine the effects of environmental influences
(including chemical, biological, and psychosocial) on the health and development
of approximately 100,000 children across the United States, following them from
before birth until age 21. The report, published by the National Academies Press,
is based on a review conducted by the National Research Council in collaboration
with the Institute of Medicine to ensure that the National Children's Study (NCS)
is scientifically rigorous and is being carried out with the best available methods.
Topics include NCS goals, conceptual framework, and core hypotheses; priority
outcome and exposure measures; study design, data collection, and analysis; ethical
procedures and community engagement; and conclusions and recommendations. An
executive summary, references, and biographical sketches of the review panel
members are included. The report is
available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12211 (requires
sign-in for free .pdf download).
************************************************************
4. RESEARCHERS REVIEW EVIDENCE ON THE IMPACT OF WEIGHT GAIN AMONG WOMEN DURING
PREGNANCY
Outcomes of Maternal Weight Gain presents findings from a systematic literature
review focusing on evidence for the influence of gestational weight gain on birth,
infant health, and maternal health outcomes. The report, published by the Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality, provides background information on weight
gain recommendations and gestational weight gain patterns in the United States.
Additional chapters contain information on the methods and results and a discussion
of the findings. Selected topics include outcomes of gestational weight gain,
confounders and effect modifiers of outcomes of maternal weight gain, risks and
benefits of gestational weight gain recommendations, and anthropometrics of weight
measurement during pregnancy. Limitations of the evidence base and review as
well as future research directions are also discussed. The abstract and full
report (large file) are available
at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/admattp.htm.
************************************************************
5. AUTHORS EXAMINE EVIDENCE ON THE BENEFITS AND HARMS OF SCREENING FOR GESTATIONAL
DIABETES MELLITUS
"We identified no randomized, controlled trials of gestational diabetes screening
at 24 weeks' gestation or later. . .
[and]
found limited evidence on screening and treating gestational diabetes diagnosed
before 24 weeks' gestation," state the authors of an article published in the
May 20, 2008, issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine. Gestational diabetes
is defined as "any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition
during pregnancy." The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concluded
in 2003 that there was insufficient evidence to advise for or against routinely
screening all pregnant women for gestational diabetes. This article presents
findings from a systematic review to update 2003 USPSTF recommendations by examining
the evidence for the potential benefits and harms of gestational diabetes screening
and treatment in improving final health
outcomes for mothers and infants.
Articles were identified from searches of selected databases for literature published
from January 2000 to November 15, 2007, supplemented by a search for literature
on screening before 24 weeks' gestation published from 1966 to 1999. Additional
data sources included outside experts and reviews of bibliographies and the 2003
evidence synthesis. Selected studies used the one- or two-step screening method
and the diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association, American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, or World Health Organization and examined
one or more of the following outcomes: neonatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal
death); brachial plexus injury; clavicular fracture; neonatal intensive care
for hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, or respiratory distress syndrome; maternal
mortality; and preeclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension. Studies were synthesized
qualitatively rather than quantitatively because of heterogeneity and were categorized
according to whether diagnosis and treatment occurred before or after 24 weeks'
gestation and whether the comparison was against no treatment or a comparison
treatment.
The authors found
- No randomized, controlled trials of screening and subsequent treatment.
- Little evidence on sensitivity and specificity for the primary health outcomes.
- One good-quality study suggesting that treatment of a screening-detected
population with mild gestational diabetes reduced serious neonatal and maternal
outcomes in a population similar to the U.S. population in terms of ethnicity
and obesity levels. This new evidence adds to evidence from a 1966 study
that found a reduction in macrosomia (abnormally large body size) with gestational
diabetes treatment compared with no treatment.
- Fair evidence that during the first few weeks after screening, women with
positive results on screening for gestational diabetes may report higher
anxiety, more psychological distress, and poorer perceptions of their general
health than women with negative results. However, these differences do not
persist into the late third trimester or postpartum period.
- Limited evidence that quality of life is not worse in women receiving gestational
diabetes treatment than in women not receiving treatment.
The USPSTF limited this review to (1) current national and international standard
criteria for gestational diabetes diagnosis, (2) assessing the potential benefits
of gestational diabetes screening during the perinatal and immediate postpartum
period, and (3) a select group of outcomes. Ongoing studies will address important
gaps in the literature. The Hperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome study
will provide information on how glycemic level may relate to outcomes and will
help to identify an ideal diagnostic threshold. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units
Network is studying outcomes with treatment vs. no treatment of mild gestational
diabetes detected by a two-step approach. Other trials are evaluating the efficacy
and safety of metfornin in
pregnancy.
Hillier TA, Vesco KK, Pedula KL, et al. 2008. Screening for gestational diabetes
mellitus: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals
of Internal Medicine 148(10):766-775. Abstract
available at http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/148/10/766?etoc.
Readers: More information is available from the National Guidelines Clearinghouse
at http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?view_id=1&doc_id=12507.
************************************************************
6. ARTICLE INVESTIGATES NEIGHBORHOODS' INFLUENCE ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MATERNAL
AGE AND BIRTHWEIGHT
"For the first time, we demonstrate significant regional variation in the range
of maternal age-birthweight slopes through a thorough
multilevel analysis," write the authors of an article published in the May 2008
issue of Social Science and Medicine. Low birthweight is an important public
health concern. The risk of low birthweight is unevenly distributed along social
and economic lines, such as race and socioeconomic position. In previous investigations,
the authors observed dramatically divergent patterns in the association between
maternal age and low birthweight for black and white mothers. For white mothers,
the risk of low birthweight did not change significantly with maternal age. In
contrast, black mothers experienced a 5% higher risk of low birthweight for each
additional year of maternal age. For both black and white mothers, infant birthweight
decreased with increasing maternal age for women who were unmarried, were smokers,
or who resided in poorer neighborhoods. Neighborhoods constitute a key determinant
of racial and socioeconomic disparities in health, as they shape individual opportunities
and expose residents to multiple risks and resources over the life course. The
study described in this article investigates how neighborhood may explain previously
detected social disparities in the relationship between birthweight and maternal
age. The focus is on trends in infant birthweight in relation to maternal age
-- birthweight slope. The authors focus on the extent to which these slopes vary
across urban neighborhoods, the stability of neighborhood differences over time,
and features of neighborhoods that are associated with positive vs. negative
slopes.
For the study, the authors analyzed 229,613 singleton births of mothers ages
20-45 from Chicago, IL, during the period 1997-2002.
The authors found that
- Neighborhood maternal age-birthweight slopes ranged from a decrease of
17g per additional year of maternal age to an increase of 10g per additional
year of maternal age.
- Neighborhood clusters (NCs) with negative slopes had higher levels of concentrated
poverty and lower levels of neighborhood support. (NCs were defined based
on geographic boundaries and knowledge of traditional Chicago neighborhoods.)
- Concentrated poverty was a significant predictor of mean birthweight and
of maternal age-birthweight slope within a neighborhood. As concentrated
neighborhood poverty in the neighborhood increased, the lower level of birthweight
found in older mothers became more pronounced.
- The significant variations across neighborhoods in the association between
maternal age and birthweight are stable over time.
The authors conclude that "the salient role that neighborhood economic conditions
played in modifying age-related disparities in health in our study highlight
the need for public health practitioners to shift away from solely focusing on
health care as a strategy to reduce age disparities in health, and to consider
interventions aimed at improving
neighborhood characteristics."
Cerda M, Buka SL, Rich-Edwards JW. 2008. Neighborhood influences on the association
between maternal age and birthweight: A multilevel investigation of age-related
disparities in health. Social Science and Medicine 66(9):2048-2060. Abstract
available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235925%232008%23999339990%23684220%23FLA%23&_cdi=5925&_pubType=J&_auth=y&_acct=C000035538&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=655954&md5=f6845b6424aea3b6b7d139f46d8f1bf5.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Preconception and Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org with
SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body
of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org with
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body
of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2008 by National Center for Education in Maternal and Child
Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is produced
by Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education in
Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreements (U02MC00001 and U48MC08717)
with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau
reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work
for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others. For all
other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or part of the information
contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions. Please contact
us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************