
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.
June 12, 2009
1. Guidance and Tools Available to Help Pediatric
Practices Qualify and Quantify Care in the Medical Home
2. Employee Tip Sheet Features Wellness Visit Schedules
For Health Plans and Worksite Programs
3. Article Examines the Degree of Fidelity in Providing
Substance Abuse Prevention Programming in a School-Based Setting
4. Study Assesses Primary Care Health Professionals'
Rates of Screening for Emotional Distress Among Adolescents
5. Authors Examine the Processes Contributing to
Breastfeeding Decisions Among Women
************************************************************
1. GUIDANCE AND TOOLS AVAILABLE TO HELP PEDIATRIC PRACTICES QUALIFY
AND QUANTIFY CARE IN THE MEDICAL HOME
Building Your Medical Home is a Web site designed to support the
development or improvement of a pediatric medical home (defined as
primary care that addresses and integrates high-quality health
promotion, acute care, and chronic-condition management in a planned,
coordinated, and family-centered manner). The Web site, produced by the
American Academy of Pediatrics' National Center for Medical Home
Implementation, is organized into the following six building blocks:
(1) care partnership support, (2) clinical care information, (3)
care-delivery management, (4) resources and linkages, (5)
practice-performance measurement, and (6) payment and finance. Each
block contains guidance and tools for improving care while also meeting
national standards for quality. The tools and related information may
be used as they are provided or adapted to meet specific practice
needs. The Web site is available at http://www.pediatricmedhome.org.
************************************************************
2. EMPLOYEE TIP SHEET FEATURES WELLNESS VISIT SCHEDULES FOR HEALTH
PLANS AND WORKSITE PROGRAMS
Recommended Wellness Visits Charts for Children, Adolescents, and Women
provides charts and descriptions of the components of a wellness visit
across the age continuum. The employee tip sheet, produced by the
National Business Group on Health's Center for Prevention and Health
Services as a companion to Investing in Maternal and Child Health: An
Employer’s Toolkit, is designed to help employees understand procedures
and screenings and to begin discussions with their doctors about their
health and risk factors for diseases. The tip sheet presents a series
of charts, each representing the recommended schedule of care by age
range (birth to 9 months, 12 months to age 9, ages 10 to 21, and ages
18 to 75). Colors indicate whether each screening or procedure is
necessary at a given age and for whom it is most useful (everyone, or
only people with risk factors as determined by a doctor). The charts
are followed by descriptions of the components of a wellness visit,
including history, measurement, development and behavioral assessment,
and procedures (immunizations and screenings). Additional resources
present information on cancer prevention and control, vaccines and
immunizations, overweight and obesity, sexual health, smoking and
tobacco, child development, and healthy life stages. The tip sheet is
available at http://www.businessgrouphealth.org/pdfs/NBGH_WellChild_final.pdf.
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE EXAMINES THE DEGREE OF FIDELITY IN PROVIDING SUBSTANCE ABUSE
PREVENTION PROGRAMMING IN A SCHOOL-BASED SETTING
"Instructors were stronger in covering the content of the curricula
than in their use of appropriate instructional strategies," state the
authors of an article published in the June 2009 issue of Health
Education Research. The most effective preventive interventions are
based on strong theoretical and conceptual frameworks. These frameworks
specify not only the targets for the intervention (e.g., normative
beliefs, skills building) but also the processes and mechanisms through
which intervention participants integrate and internalize desired
attitudes and behaviors. Of particular importance is measuring the
degree to which a newly developed intervention achieves both short- and
long-term objectives and assessing adherence to delivery style,
coverage of materials, and participant involvement in the intervention
processes (implementation fidelity). The article presents findings from
a study to examine the association of implementation fidelity and the
targeted mediators of a substance-abuse-prevention program, Take Charge
of Your Life. Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) officer
instructors deliver this program to students in grade 7 and 9.
For the purposes of the current study, the dimensions of implementation
fidelity encompassed content coverage and instructional strategy. To
measure these components, officer instructors were observed in the
classroom. Data for the programs' targeted mediators (normative
beliefs, perceived consequences of substance use, knowledge of
resistance skills, decision-making skills) came from student surveys
completed at seven points in time over the 5-year study period. The
analysis used the observation data and data from student surveys to
address the following questions: (1) to what extent do the officer
instructors cover all the material and activities in the program
lessons and use the appropriate instructional strategies to deliver the
lesson components and (2) do students exposed to officer instructors
who deliver the lesson content with fidelity and who adhere to the
appropriate instructional strategies have better scores on lesson
mediators than those who are exposed to officer instructors with lower
levels of fidelity and adherence.
The authors found that
- There was a wide range of scores for content coverage and for the
proportion of activities delivered using the appropriate instructional
strategy.
- Overall, the median scores indicated that the officer instructors
were stronger in covering the content of the curricula than in using
appropriate instructional strategies.
- The relationship between implementation fidelity and the targeted
mediators was not consistent, but higher fidelity was associated with
better scores on some mediators.
The authors conclude that "there are no standardized definitions,
measurements or data collection methodologies to guide this research .
. . ; it will be important to develop these standards to determine to
what extent programs are implemented in the field as they are designed
to be delivered under research controlled conditions."
Sloboda Z, Stephens P, Pyakuryal A, et al. 2009. Implementation
fidelity: The experience of the Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention
Study. Health Education Research 24(3):394-406. Abstract available at http://her.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/3/394.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Smoking and Tobacco Use Prevention: Bibliography at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_smokingprev
- Substance Use: Organizations Resource List at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/organizations.php?target=auto_search_subuse
************************************************************
4. STUDY ASSESSES PRIMARY CARE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' RATES OF SCREENING
FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AMONG ADOLESCENTS
"About one-third of California teenagers report being screened for
emotional distress during a visit with their primary care provider,"
state the authors of an article published in the June 2009 issue of the
Journal of Adolescent Health. In addition to the dearth of studies on
the rates of screening for depression in primary care, there are also
several limitations to the current data. The article presents findings
from a study to address gaps in the literature on screening adolescents
for depression in primary care. The main focus of the study was to
assess health professionals' rates of discussing emotional health among
clinic-based and population-based samples in California. A secondary
analysis assessed the degree to which health professional screening
rates varied if an adolescent endorsed symptoms of distress.
Data for the study were drawn from two large independent datasets: (1)
adolescent data collected in outpatient pediatric clinics within a
large managed care organization and (2) adolescent data collected from
the 2003 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS). The managed
care-pediatric clinic sample comprised 1,089 adolescents ages 13 to 17
who completed a survey about health professional screening behavior
when exiting a clinic well visit. The CHIS 2003 sample was restricted
to a total of 899 adolescents ages 13 to 17 who reported that they had
a physical examination within the past 3 months. In addition to an
assessment of health professional screening, the CHIS dataset included
a measure of depressive symptoms completed by all adolescents. The
measure used an eight-item depression scale modified from the Center
for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. The analysis examined rates
of health professional screening for emotional distress in the
pediatric clinic and CHIS samples and, for the CHIS sample, whether
rates varied by adolescent distress.
The authors found that
- Overall, slightly over one-third of adolescents (34 percent)
reported that their doctor talked to them about getting help if they
felt sad or depressed.
- Younger adolescents (ages 13 to 14) were significantly less
likely to report the discussion (30.6 percent) than older adolescents
(ages 15 to 17; 37.0 percent).
- Female adolescents reported significantly higher rates of talking
about getting help if they felt sad or depressed (36.4 percent)
compared to male adolescents (30.4 percent).
- Among the racial and ethnic groups, Latino adolescents were more
likely to say that their doctor talked to them about sadness or
depression than their white counterparts.
- Among adolescents endorsing emotional distress, about one-third
(34.7 percent) reported talking to their doctor about their emotions or
mood.
- Among distressed adolescents, female adolescents were
significantly more likely than male adolescents to talk to their doctor
about their emotions or mood (41.7 percent) than males (24.7 percent).
The authors conclude that "this translates to close to 49,000
distressed adolescents who "missed" talking with their provider.
Primary care clinicians-systems need to better utilize the opportunity
to positively influence the health of adolescents."
Ozer EM, Zahnd EG, Adams SH, et al. 2009. Are adolescents being
screened for emotional distress in primary care? Journal of Adolescent
Health 44(6):520-527. Abstract available at http://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(08)00685-X/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Emotional, Behavioral, and Mental Health Challenges in Children and
Adolescents: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_Mental_Conditions.html
- Adolescent Mental Health: Bibliography at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_adolmenhlth
- Children's Mental Health: Bibliography at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_chldmenhlth
- Mental Health in Primary Care: Bibliography at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_mental
************************************************************
5. AUTHORS EXAMINE THE PROCESSES CONTRIBUTING TO BREASTFEEDING
DECISIONS AMONG WOMEN
"Women might benefit by reconceptualizing breastfeeding as a learned
skill," state the authors of an article published in the June 2009
issue of Birth. Data from the 2008 National Immunization Survey show
that only 23 U.S. states have achieved the Healthy People 2010
breastfeeding initiation goal of 75 percent. Only 10 states have met
the target of 50 percent breastfeeding at 6 months, and 12 states have
met the target of 25 percent at 12 months. As of 2007, no states had
achieved the 3- or 6-month targets for exclusive breastfeeding. To
promote target achievement effectively, it is essential to understand
the processes by which women make and sustain decisions about infant
feeding. Few studies have explored how women conceptualize infant
feeding and the processes whereby they integrate perceptions of infant
feeding into their decision-making. The article presents findings from
a qualitative study to explore the processes that mothers who
successfully breastfeed use in making the decision to breastfeed.
Data for the study were obtained from focus groups originally
commissioned in 2002 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services to inform the National Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign. The
focus groups, with between 4 and 11 participants each, took place in
Chicago, New Orleans, and San Francisco and comprised 12 groups of
pregnant women and 6 groups each of breastfeeding and formula-feeding
mothers. The groups were divided by race and feeding status. The study
analyzed transcripts from the 24 groups of pregnant, formula-feeding,
and breastfeeding women. The analysis used a modified grounded theory
approach to understand the processes by which women make and sustain
the decision to breastfeed.
The authors labeled the process that emerged as associated with
successful breastfeeding "confident commitment." The process had three
integral components: (1) confidence in the process of breastfeeding,
(2) confidence in one's ability to breastfeed, and (3) commitment to
making breastfeeding work despite challenges or lack of support.
- Participants reported varying levels of confidence in the process
of breastfeeding. Their confidence was affected by concerns about the
ability of breastmilk to nourish and satisfy their infant, about the
infant's breastfeeding ability, and about their own ability to cope
with the discomfort and inconvenience that they associated with
breastfeeding.
- Most pregnant women's statements about breastfeeding indicated
that they wanted to breastfeed and that they intended to try it,
although very few firmly stated that they definitely would breastfeed
(reflecting neither confidence nor commitment).
- Only breastfeeding mothers and some pregnant women made
statements that reflected "confident commitment." Breastfeeding mothers
reported overcoming pain, misgivings about the quality and quantity of
their milk, and negative pressure from significant others so as to
maintain breastfeeding. Breastfeeding mothers made no statements
reflecting lack of commitment.
- A few of the breastfeeding mothers decided to breastfeed based on
the recommendations of their caregivers in the hospital but developed
"confident commitment" as a result of their early breastfeeding
successes.
- Most focus group participants' statements did not reflect the
understanding that breastfeeding is a learned skill.
The authors conclude that "prenatal education can play a vital role in
reframing breastfeeding as a learning experience for both mother and
baby."
Avery A, Zimmerman K, Underwood PW, et al. 2009. Confident commitment
is a key factor for sustained breastfeeding. Birth 36(2):141-148.
Abstract available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122413901/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Breastfeeding and Working Mothers: Bibliography at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_brfeedwork
- Breastfeeding Promotion, Support, and Education at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_brfeedprom
- Breastfeeding: Organizations Resource List at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/organizations.php?target=auto_search_brfeed
- Breastfeeding: Resource Brief at
http://mchlibrary.info/guides/breastfeeding.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/
************************************************************